Re: [hypermail] getting the hypermail project on its feet again

From: Peter C. McCluskey <>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:04:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <> (Daniel Stenberg) writes:
>Let me suggest that we do this in some kind of organized way. We take
>volounteers for taking on the maintainer's role and then we vote on the
>nominees. We give the process like three weeks and when the time's up we go
>with the winner and may the source be with us!
>Or what do you guys say?

 It's been 3 weeks, and I haven't seen any other volunteers for the job. So if I don't hear any objections soon, I will try to assume the role I described earlier.
 Ashley, can you give me CVS write access?

 Does anybody object to branching the current code into a 2.0 stable release and a 2.1 head for new features?
 Does this look like the right sequence for implementing the branch?: edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.0.0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h
cvs rtag -b 2.0.0 hypermail
upload to sourceforge
edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.1a0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h

Peter McCluskey          | Fed up with democracy's problems? Examine Futarchy: | or .ps
Received on Mon 12 Feb 2001 04:06:50 AM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:12 AM GMT GMT