Re: Problem with attached HTML document

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:47:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.SO4.4.05.9810141015590.10189-100000_at_wcsw062>

On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Tom von Alten wrote:

> It seems like direct inclusion of an HTML document is somewhat
> problematic! I suppose we might want (to set) an option to *not* include
> an attached HTML file inline...

I agree 100%. Direct inclusion of HTML files is a very bad idea. We can only try and hope for the best unless anyone feels like writing a pretty advanced HTML parser that scans for and traps/avoids all those things it should avoid.

An option to disable this "feature" is a must.

   Daniel Stenberg     0708-317742
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Received on Wed 14 Oct 1998 10:50:53 AM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:50 PM GMT GMT