Re: It is obvious

From: Byron C. Darrah <>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 17:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <>

> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 23:45:28 +0100 (MET)
> From: Daniel Stenberg <>
> Hi
> I'd like to see a new project maintainer for Hypermail 2. Five long months
> have passed since the previous version was announced from Kent and he hasn't
> even posted more than a few mails during that time.
> I think Kent has made a great job and put a lot of effort into this, but to
> make hypermail move on I strongly urge that we find new ways of making
> progress. We can't just sit and wait for Kent forever.

Yep, I agree with Daniel and the others. One suggestion, though: the new project should not be called "hypermail" unless Kent gives express consent. It should probably be called something similar, to show it's origin, but different enough that it would not cause confusion if Kent or someone ever releases a new version of hypermail.

Has anyone got any ideas what we could call it?

("WebberMail"? :-)

--Byron Darrah Received on Fri 05 Feb 1999 03:10:40 AM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT