Re: It is obvious

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 23:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <>

On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Randall S. Winchester wrote:

> I was really hopeing Kent would send out his current code base for us to
> move on from. If this is avaliable, this would be my recommendation.

Yes. I've waited for that since his mail about it, posted Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:14:30 -0600 (CST).
> 1) Make HyperMail Year-2000 friendly. It is currently not compliant. Kent
> had fixed this in his source tree (or so I understood).

AFAIK, I have those fixes in my version too.

> 2) Put out a reasonably stable version (with the Y2K fixes).

Well, I am gonna prioritize stabillity now. On public request. Can't talk for other authors or versions though, I probably won't work on other versions than my 2b13 or Kent's coming one.

> I remember the last time Kent disappeared, there was a phone number for
> him. I will be more then glad to call, despite the long distance charges,
> if it would allow us to go forward with Kent's two cents included as
> well.

Sure, call him, I would like his version too. It is a little bit too distant for me... :-)

             Daniel Stenberg -
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Received on Tue 09 Feb 1999 12:25:30 AM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:50 PM GMT GMT