Re: Time stamps

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 23:04:48 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <>

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Craig A Summerhill wrote:

> > PS: Does anyone have access to the 'who' list of
> >
> Personally, I guess I'm content to leave it alone for the time being.

I don't think anyone but Kent has access to that.

> Of course, a contingency plan (like where to go if it suddenly stops
> working) might be in order. I suggest we just rely on Daniel's web site
> to announce a change in the list location when (if?) this one stops
> working...

I agree that the worst scenario would be if stopped working as a mailinglist (even if I already dislike its configuration, which rejects posts from non-subscribed addresses).

What I think is more painful is that is always referred to as the main hypermail web site and it says that the latest available version is 2.0b3. I've lost count on the number of times I've received bug reports in private mails which later turned out to be because they used b3 as the web pages suggest and then the bugs disappeared when they upgraded to a later version... Because of this annoying situation, I'll change the default hypermail URL to point to my web page until the situation improves. At least my info is more updated at present.

             Daniel Stenberg -
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Received on Thu 18 Mar 1999 12:10:10 AM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:50 PM GMT GMT