naming them beta again?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Daniel Stenberg <Daniel.Stenberg_at_frontec.se_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:20:28 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9909021419010.8577-100000_at_jinx>

Yes

How would you all feel about changing the naming of the tarballs back into beta? It would probably get more people to use them and they actually do work better than the versions labelled as betas...!

-- 
  Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast/

Received on Fri 03 Sep 1999 10:23:16 PM GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ashley M. Kirchner: "Re: naming them beta again?"
Previous message: Daniel Stenberg: "Re: mailer prog died with signal 13"
Next in thread: Ashley M. Kirchner: "Re: naming them beta again?"
Reply: Ashley M. Kirchner: "Re: naming them beta again?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT