Re: Status

From: Kent Landfield <>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:39:37 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <>

# On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Kent Landfield wrote:
# > - docs/attachments.txt : Determine if this is needed. If so update. If
# > not remove after assuring the updated information
# > is incorporated into the appropriate documentation.
# I think it is a good document, even though it should get updated to reflect
# the latest implementation. It is not 100% correct.

I do to. Could you update it a pit wit the state of things ?

# > - There appears to be a little clutter in the directory that
# > is unneeded/unwanted. They should be removed from the distribution
# > baseline. maketgz ?? src/Formatting ?? others ??
# # ls src/Formatting
# src/Formatting: No such file or directory.

I removed it from the CVS baseline as it was a working file of mine that should never have been in there.

# I don't have that in the release-archives, that must be in the CVS-only.
# 'maketgz' is the shell script I use to build releases. It uses the FILES
# file to determine what files to include and it correctly names the directory
# and the VERSION in patchlevel.h to the version number that is given to it
# when it prompts the user. I think it should be left in there to enable us to
# make releases easier. Anyone can make a release and it will look identical,
# no matter who runs the script.

Ok. Sounds good.

Kent Landfield                        Phone: 1-817-545-2502             
Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at
Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at
Received on Mon 11 Oct 1999 03:40:56 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT