Re: Should we leave this automatic handling of signatures and HTML?

From: <>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:02:38 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <>


Thanks for clearing this up.

I'll leave the option as is. I noticed that in one of the RFC references that Paul send, they talk about defining a new MIME type for this kind of signature messages. We'll worry about it later, I guess.

I'll leave this auto-detection as is.


p.s. I had tried a search for this, but used the "signature" keyword and found lots of things about signed (cryptography) messages instead. Received on Thu 04 Nov 1999 06:04:10 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT