On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Tom von Alten wrote:
> > Now just pipe this message through hypermail.
>
> Somehow, I don't imagine 129,000 concatenated messages are going to "just
> pipe" through hypermail, either.
No. It'll bloat to death. Hypermail keeps the mailbox in memory.
> Someone with more experience than me will have to come up with something
> that will work, but I wouldn't expect this simple command line stuff to
> work at the scale of the problem that Chris describes.
I agree with Tom here. Even *if* hypermail would grok this, would anyone really like an index page with 129,000 mail links? Hey, I use to think an index page with 1,000 entries is annoying...
I would make a script that would split the whole set in at least 500 parts. Possibly somehow using the dates in the individual mails. Then I would run hypermail on every one of those 500 parts.
I would avoid making a script that adds single mails to hypermail, as that would make the total operation even slower.
Just my ideas, ignore them at will.
-- Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77 ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`olReceived on Mon 25 Sep 2000 11:59:18 PM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:52 PM GMT GMT