Re: [hypermail] getting the hypermail project on its feet again

 daniel_at_haxx.se (Daniel Stenberg) writes:
>Let me suggest that we do this in some kind of organized way. We take
>volounteers for taking on the maintainer's role and then we vote on the
>nominees. We give the process like three weeks and when the time's up we go
>with the winner and may the source be with us!
>
>Or what do you guys say?

 It's been 3 weeks, and I haven't seen any other volunteers for the job. So if I don't hear any objections soon, I will try to assume the role I described earlier.
 Ashley, can you give me CVS write access?

 Does anybody object to branching the current code into a 2.0 stable release and a 2.1 head for new features?
 Does this look like the right sequence for implementing the branch?: edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.0.0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h
cvs rtag -b 2.0.0 hypermail
maketgz
upload to sourceforge
edit patchlevel.h to VERSION "2.1a0"
cvs commit patchlevel.h

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter McCluskey          | Fed up with democracy's problems? Examine Futarchy:
http://www.rahul.net/pcm | http://hanson.gmu.edu/futarchy.pdf or .ps