jose.kahan_at_w3.org (jose.kahan_at_w3.org) writes:
>In our previous episode, Peter C. McCluskey said:
>>
>> My limited experience with wanting to find attachments suggests that
>> the index as currently implemented isn't easy to use. What I would
>> find useful is to add a list of attachment file names after each message.
>> Does anyone object to my making such sub-lists a standard feature of the
>> attachment lists?
>> --
>
>Could you give us a more visual statement of your proposition? It's hard
>to see what it would look like before you do it.
Here are two versions of what I have in mind (the additions being the added <ul> or <ol> sections; I think I prefer the second version):
<li><a href="0054.html"><strong>Startup Kit file (DOC and RTF)</strong></a> <a name="54"><em>Bruce Smith</em></a> <em>(Fri Jan 12 2001 - 00:37:53 PST)</em> <ul> <li><a href="att-0054/01-StartUpKit.DOC">01-StartUpKit.DOC</a> <li><a href="att-0054/02-StartupKit.rtf">02-StartupKit.rtf</a> </ul> <li><a href="0054.html"><strong>Startup Kit file (DOC and RTF)</strong></a> <a name="54"><em>Bruce Smith</em></a> <em>(Fri Jan 12 2001 - 00:37:53 PST)</em> <ol> <li><a href="att-0054/01-StartUpKit.DOC">StartUpKit.DOC</a> (160256 bytes)<li><a href="att-0054/02-StartupKit.rtf">StartupKit.rtf</a> (112609 bytes) </ol>
For messages whose attachments are all inlined, I would make no changes (unless people encourage me to leave them out of the attachments index entirely - I'm not sure why they are being listed).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:12 AM GMT GMT