Re: [hypermail] anchors don't have leading zero

Hi,

The point is that the 2.1.6 behaviour was to use the call only in the case set_indextable is false. Otherwise email->msgnum was used directly. I don't know about the latter case, since I have not tested it. But I am sure that in the former case, the '<a href=..>' tags which should match the '<a name=' tags I am talking about are generated by the fprint_menu0 in print.c:280, and it certainly uses the raw email->msgnum and prints it in a %d format. If the anchors are generated using massage_name(), the links should be similarly generated! Also, the case I was discussing was only the thread index, so if you change the way fprint_menu0 is working, you should start worry about the other types of indices.

Best,

Zvi.

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:21:50 +0100, Jose Kahan wrote about "Re: [hypermail] anchors don't have leading zero":
> Hi,
>
> This patch removed the call to the hashed msgid num. The patch
> should have been applied to message_name().
>
> If using the hashed msgid num is something you don't want, let's remove
> it completely!
>
> Otherwise, we get into a never-ending loop of changes that keep coming
> back.
>
> -jose
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:24:13AM -0800, Peter C. McCluskey wrote:
> > rl_at_math.technion.ac.il ("Zvi Har'El") writes:
> > >I identified the culprit, in threadprint.c . The patch is:
> >
> > Thanks. I've committed this patch.

-- 
Dr. Zvi Har'El     mailto:rl_at_math.technion.ac.il     Department of Mathematics
tel:+972-54-227607 icq:179294841     Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
fax:+972-4-8324654 http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/     Haifa 32000, ISRAEL
"If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all." -- Thumper (1942)
                           Wednesday, 26 Shevat 5763, 29 January 2003,  5:04PM