Re: [hypermail] reverse_folders flag

 fgoebel_at_mppmu.mpg.de (Florian Goebel) writes:
>I just got hypermail-2.1.6 from your web page and compiled it on an Alpha
>machine. It is really a nice tool and it's already basically working fine for
>me. I just found one problem: The flag: reverse_folders = 1 does not seem to
>have any effect (I am using it together with monthly_index = 1). In the
>summary.html file the monthly links are in any case ordered such that the
>first month comes first and the most recent month comes last. Is there
>anything I can do about it?

 The reverse_folders option was only designed to work on folders (directories). The monthly_index = 1 option is an unrelated feature which does not involve creating new directories. The folder_by_date option is generally better (especially for archives with thousands of messages where it avoids large index files and slow performance due to too many files in one directory), so I haven't given much thought to the monthly_index option since the folder_by_date option was implemented.
 It probably makes sense to apply reverse_folders to the monthly_index option. I will try to look into that next week.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter McCluskey          | 
http://www.rahul.net/pcm |