RE: [hypermail] tar file of pre-commit hypermail WAI enhancements

From: Tom von Alten <tva_at_hp.com_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:01:23 -0600
Message-ID: <000501c31a42$d5468c40$d919ed0f_at_boi.hp.com>

I concur. My preference for the default setup would be to have a single .css pointed to by all archives, next best would be to have one .css in each archive. A sysadmin could keep the "one per" setup and link them all together if desired.

---

Tom von Alten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hypermail_at_hypermail.org
> [mailto:owner-hypermail_at_hypermail.org]On Behalf Of Paul Haldane
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 12:56 PM
> To: hypermail_at_hypermail.org
> Subject: RE: [hypermail] tar file of pre-commit hypermail WAI
> enhancements
>
>
> > From: Jose Kahan
> >
> > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:43:26PM -0700, Peter C. McCluskey wrote:
> > >
> ...
> > Up to now, if the user doesn't specify a default CSS, we're
> > embedding CSS rules at the top of each file produced by
> > hypermail. After thinking about this, I guess this was the
> > wrong approach (I'm the one who had proposed it, so blame
> > me!). I think that it would be good to change this so that
> > hypermail points to a default CSS location, e.g., the
> > directory where the archive is being produced, and have
> > hypermail copy or generate a default CSS file there. Then
> > have all the messages point there. This way, you can change
> > all your style without having to rebuild the archive.
> >
> > What do you think about this?
>
> Sounds like a good idea - I'd much rather be able to tweak the look of
> of the archive without having to regenerate it.
>
> Paul
>

Received on Wed 14 May 2003 08:43:16 PM GMT