Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch. It solved the test case completely. However, it seems that the same "Starting" and "Ending" dates are shown for all folders. Attached is a MBOX file (3 messages) to simulate the problem. I would appreciate if you can look into it as well.
LIST OF FOLDERS:
Starting Mon Mar 20 1995 - 09:08:17 CST, Ending Fri Dec 06 1996 -
22:45:18 CST
FOLDER: 1996/Dec
Starting Mon Mar 20 1995 - 09:08:17 CST, Ending Fri Dec 06 1996 -
22:45:18 CST
FOLDER: 1996/Jan
Starting Mon Mar 20 1995 - 09:08:17 CST, Ending Fri Dec 06 1996 -
22:45:18 CST
FOLDER: 1995/Mar
Starting Mon Mar 20 1995 - 09:08:17 CST, Ending Fri Dec 06 1996 -
22:45:18 CST
Best regards.
Frank
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:47, Peter C.McCluskey wrote:
> I've checked in a fix for this. It looks like it was recently introduced
> (two getdatestr() calls in one argument list - getdatestr() returns a static
> buffer).
>From daemon Wed Dec 6 22:45:18 1996
Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by alice.jcc.com; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/01Aug94-0142PM)
id AA03718; Wed, 6 Dec 1996 22:45:14 -0500 Message-Id: <9603070345.AA03718_at_alice.jcc.com> Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU by ccvm.sunysb.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
with BSMTP id 5184; Wed, 06 Dec 96 22:27:54 EST Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV_at_SBCCVM) by CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0610; Wed, 6 Dec 1996 22:27:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1996 16:29:13 NZT Reply-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_ccvm.sunysb.edu> Sender: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_ccvm.sunysb.edu> From: David Godfrey <David_Godfrey_at_CONAK1CC_at_SMTP.CONTINUUM.CO.NZ>
Subject: Re[2]: Z39.50 X-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_ccvm.sunysb.edu>
Just as a 'final' bit of info on Z39.50 - for those of you who want to
know -
THE website for this is http://lcweb.loc.gov/Z3950/agency - the
Library of Congress are responsible for its maintance. Also you'll
find implemntors etc.
Another site is http://www.research.att.com/~wald/Z3950 (maybe
z39.50...)
Hope this helps
David
dgodfrey_at_continuum.co.nz
>From daemon Sun Jan 21 17:14:18 1996
Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by alice.jcc.com; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/01Aug94-0142PM)
id AA22280; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 17:14:16 -0500 Message-Id: <9601212214.AA22280_at_alice.jcc.com> Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU by ccvm.sunysb.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
with BSMTP id 0413; Sun, 21 Jan 96 17:04:56 EST
Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV_at_SBCCVM) by CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3135; Sun, 21 Jan 1996 17:04:54 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 09:01:34 +0000
Reply-To: bpihlama_at_nla.gov.au
Sender: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_ccvm.sunysb.edu>
From: Bruce Pihlamae <bpihlama_at_NLA.GOV.AU>
Organization: CSC
Subject: Re: How many levels or redo mirroring ? X-To: Ken Friday <ken.friday_at_TELDTA.COM>, ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.SUNYSB.EDUTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_ccvm.sunysb.edu>
> If I'm running my entire database (database, control, and redolog
> files) on RAID 0+1, does it make sense to have Oracle mirror the redo
> logs (in addition to the RAID protection) ?
If all your disks are already mirrored (RAID1) then don't bother doing Oracle mirroring on the REDO logs. Its extra overhead you don't need.
If you have only striped (RAID0) then you have no recoverability so you should using the Oracle REDO log mirroring.
Having said that, it is not good practice to use RAID1 mirroring on 'write only' files because of the overhead and slowness of writes. Better to RAID1 your database and keep things like REDO logs, RBS and TEMP on other fast write devices. In this case you would use Oracle's REDO log mirroring.
Bruce...
T T T T T T T T Bruce Pihlamae I I I I I I I I bpihlama_at_nla.gov.au I I I I I I I I National Library of Australia T T T T T T T T Phone: +616 262-1480 ----------------- Fax: +616 273-2116 ===================
>From owner-oracle-l_at_CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU Mon Mar 20 09:08:17 1995
Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by alice.jcc.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/01Aug94-0142PM)
id AA15095; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 09:08:13 -0500 Message-Id: <9503201408.AA15095_at_alice.jcc.com> Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU by CCVM.sunysb.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 8899; Mon, 20 Mar 95 08:54:17 EST Received: from CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV_at_SBCCVM) by CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2206; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 08:54:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 08:35:28 GMT Reply-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.sunysb.edu> Sender: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.sunysb.edu> From: John C Flack <jflack_at_ACF.DHHS.GOV>
Subject: USER_SOURCE X-To: ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.SUNYSB.EDUTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_CCVM.sunysb.edu>
Dave Henley -
The problem is that USER_SOURCE is not really a table, it is a view. The
underlying table for that view is a data dictionary table owned by SYS.
Exporting a user doesn't really export any rows in the data dictionary
tables, it exports CREATE object commands for the objects owned by the userFrom owner-hypermail-outgoing_at_hypermail.org Fri Jun 27 16:10:59 2003
Return-Path: <owner-hypermail-outgoing_at_hypermail.org>
Received: by dev.hypermail.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 5C3DF2704F3; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:10:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from violet.rahul.net (violet.rahul.net [66.237.72.28])
by dev.hypermail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111162704F2 for <hypermail_at_hypermail.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:10:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by violet.rahul.net (Postfix, from userid 1448) id C5457BC4A; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:08:36 -0700 (PDT)To: Frank Naude <naudefj_at_telkomsa.net> Cc: hypermail_at_hypermail.org
<20030624184701.EB591BC52_at_violet.rahul.net> <1056558394.6043.70.camel_at_frank.naude.co.za>X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 19.34.1
naudefj_at_telkomsa.net (Frank Naude) writes:
>Hi Peter,
>
>Thank you for the patch. It solved the test case completely. However, it
>seems that the same "Starting" and "Ending" dates are shown for all
>folders. Attached is a MBOX file (3 messages) to simulate the problem. I
>would appreciate if you can look into it as well.
I've checked in a change to make the dates reflect the date range of the folders. Apparently nobody had attempted to make work this way until now.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter McCluskey | "To announce that there must be no criticism of http://www.rahul.net/pcm | the President, or that we are to stand by the | President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic | and servile, but morally treasonable to the | American public." - Theodore RooseveltReceived on Wed 25 Jun 2003 12:56:54 PM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:54 PM GMT GMT