#
# On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 06:25:38PM -0500, Ervin D. Walter wrote:
#
# > Indeed, this second patch is cleaner. I have verified that the
# > problem still exists in the new upstream version, but there are other
# > complications. Version 1.0 or whatever that we use in debian only
# > prints some headers (From, Subject, etc). 2.0 beta 2 prints every
# > header (received, etc) or none. I am gonna suggest to the upstream
# > developers that the 1.x functionality would be valuable.
Hmm. I'll take a look and make sure it is the same as the 1.02. It should only print a select set of headers.
if (!strncmp(bp->line, "From:", 5) || !strncmp(bp->line, "To:", 3) || !strncmp(bp->line, "Date:", 5) || !strncmp(bp->line, "Subject:", 8)) { fprintf(fp, "<STRONG>%s</STRONG><BR>\n", bp->line); }
This is what is in the code. Not sure why its dumping everything... I'll see.
# I have to admit that I haven't taken a look at the new hypermail.
# Maybe this is/could/should be user-configurable.
> From the standpoint of showing them or not, it already is. From the standpoint of selecting individual RFC822 lines, it is not.
# As far as I recall the current hypermail source lacks some of the
# patches Debian ships so it'll take some time to patch it up
# again - this prevents me from doing it at the moment...
This is true. I need to review the patches again to make sure all the system-related ones are in. (Sadly I do not have a Debian box to test it with locally.)
-- Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502 Email: kent_at_landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/ Email: kent_at_nfr.net http://www.nfr.net/ Please send comp.sources.misc related mail to kent_at_landfield.com Search the Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/Received on Sat 13 Jun 1998 02:09:27 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:49 PM GMT GMT