>A) If you just remove the <li> tags, how do you start each new link? Simply
> removing them in non-table output will make it look really bad...
Perhaps applying the patch would show what I changed. <LI> was removed per my previous post where I suggested that
16 Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Starting: Tue 16 Feb 1999 - 21:58:04 EST Ending: Mon 01 Mar 1999 - 08:44:23 EST
...was much preferred over (from memory):
o Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ date ][ subject ][ author ]
o Starting: Tue 16 Feb 1999 - 21:58:04 EST o Ending: Mon 01 Mar 1999 - 08:44:23 EST 0 16 Messages
Take a look at http://associate.com/BBS_MUG_news/HyperMail/index.html for an example.
>B) There already exists table support in hypermail 2a14+. I can't really
> tell how good it is and works, but there is support for it and I know
> (some) people use it.
The table support I was offering was for the index content - not the header. An example is at: http://associate.com/BBS_MUG_news/HyperMail/index.html
>> I was sorely tempted to place the archive name at the top of each message
>> file, but am hoping to see support for archive name and subject variables
>> in the message header files - so resisted the impulse.
>Support for those already exist. I'd advice you to read the hmrc.4 file a
>little bit more careful. %l will show the "archive label" and %s will show
>you the subject.
Great! I'll see if this works. I've reported here that the options.h file is not working to define header, footer, or many other settings. Since using environment variables and command-line switches is not what I want here, I have to use an rc file or options.h. If Hypermail is migrating away from options.h, how about just eliminating it altogether? I'm running Linux and egcs 1.1-1c.
Thanks,
glen_stewart_at_associate.com Received on Tue 02 Mar 1999 04:01:21 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT