hypermail-2a14-pl2 and MIME again

From: Craig A Summerhill <craig_at_cni.org_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:42:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <9903042142.AA23905_at_a.cni.org>


Another message with attachment not properly marked up. See markup at:

   http://www.cni.org/Hforums/cni-copyright/1999-02/0419.html

In this case, there is a place where hypermail doesn't close a bold markup (a </b> is needed.

P.S. The last couple I sent are mailer errors, I know. I don't really plan on marking up large collections of mail errors with hypermail (although, I have to say browsing them in the hypermail index does make it easy to read a lot of them quickly). However, I thought the examples of how certain systems markup MIME might help the effort...

-- 

   Craig A. Summerhill, Systems Coordinator and Program Officer
   Coalition for Networked Information
   21 Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, D.C.   20036
   Internet: craig_at_cni.org   AT&Tnet (202) 296-5098

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= cut here =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
   
   From postmaster_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL Wed Mar  3 05:42:00 1999
   Received: from mail.cni.org by b.cni.org (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/13Aug97-0713PM)
   	id AA27399; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 05:41:59 -0500
   Received: from RL0002.unimaas.nl (rl0002.unimaas.nl [137.120.1.2])
   	by mail.cni.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA27832
   	for <owner-cni-copyright_at_cni.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 05:37:41 -0500
   Received: from RL0001.UNIMAAS.NL by RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3114)
    id <01J8E464KQ40002HYL_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL> for owner-cni-copyright_at_cni.org;
    Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:23:18 WE
   Received: from RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3114)
    id <01J8E43YAXIA002BU3_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL>; Wed, 03 Mar 1999 11:22:07 +0000 (WE)
   Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 11:22:07 +0000 (WE)
   From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL>
   Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
   To: owner-cni-copyright_at_cni.org
   Message-Id: <01J8E44RJTG4002BU3_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL>
   Mime-Version: 1.0
   Content-Type: MULTIPART/REPORT;
    BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_lzDPxfOxT6AjRp+u34z3GA)"; REPORT-TYPE=DELIVERY-STATUS
   Status: RO
   
   
   --Boundary_(ID_lzDPxfOxT6AjRp+u34z3GA)
   Content-type: text/plain
   
   This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
   
     Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9903021332580.7071-100000_at_shell1.ncal.verio.com>
     Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:34:21 -0800 (PST)
     From: Terry Carroll <carroll_at_tjc.com>
     To: Multiple recipients of list <cni-copyright_at_cni.org>
     Subject: Re: Quoting Song Lyrics in Fiction (Australian Law)?
   
   Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
   
     Recipient address: mt.magermans_at_STUDENT.UNIMAAS.NL
     Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
     Diagnostic code: smtp; 550 <mt.magermans_at_STUDENT.UNIMAAS.NL>... User unknown
     Remote system: dns; rl0001.unimaas.nl (TCP|137.120.1.2|3904|137.120.1.1|25) (rl0001.rulimburg.nl ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:21:28 +0100 [MET]) (rl0001.rulimburg.nl Hello mailhost.unimaas.nl [137.120.1.2], pleased to meet you)
   
   
   --Boundary_(ID_lzDPxfOxT6AjRp+u34z3GA)
   Content-type: message/DELIVERY-STATUS
   
   Original-envelope-id: 01J8E3VEBNVQ002JIO_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL
   Reporting-MTA: dns; RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL
   
   Action: failed
   Status: 5.0.0 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
   Original-recipient: rfc822;mt.magermans_at_student.unimaas.nl
   Final-recipient: rfc822;mt.magermans_at_STUDENT.UNIMAAS.NL
   Remote-MTA: dns; rl0001.unimaas.nl (TCP|137.120.1.2|3904|137.120.1.1|25)
    (rl0001.rulimburg.nl ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:21:28
    +0100 [MET])
    (rl0001.rulimburg.nl Hello mailhost.unimaas.nl [137.120.1.2], pleased to meet
    you)
   Diagnostic-code: smtp; 550 <mt.magermans_at_STUDENT.UNIMAAS.NL>... User unknown
   
   --Boundary_(ID_lzDPxfOxT6AjRp+u34z3GA)
   Content-type: MESSAGE/RFC822
   
   Return-path: owner-cni-copyright_at_cni.org
   Received: from RL0001.UNIMAAS.NL by RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3114)
    id <01J8E43YAXIA002BU3_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL>; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:22:07 WE
   Received: from b.cni.org by RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3114)
    with SMTP id <01J8E3VE6OXG002JIO_at_RL0002.UNIMAAS.NL> for
    mt.magermans_at_STUDENT.UNIMAAS.NL; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:15:22 WE
   Received: from localhost by b.cni.org (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/13Aug97-0713PM)
    id AA26100; Wed, 03 Mar 1999 04:23:08 -0500
   Received: from mail.cni.org by b.cni.org (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/13Aug97-0713PM)
    id AA21919; Tue, 02 Mar 1999 16:38:02 -0500
   Received: from smtp1.ncal.verio.com (smtp1.ncal.verio.com [204.247.247.82])
    by mail.cni.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA25987 for
    <cni-copyright_at_cni.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 1999 16:33:57 -0500
   Received: from shell1-n1 (carroll_at_shell1.ncal.verio.com [204.247.248.254])
    by smtp1.ncal.verio.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA29894 for
    <cni-copyright_at_cni.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:34:22 -0800 (PST)
   Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:34:21 -0800 (PST)
   From: Terry Carroll <carroll_at_tjc.com>
   Subject: Re: Quoting Song Lyrics in Fiction (Australian Law)?
   In-reply-to: <l03102800b3003ec4762a_at_[10.0.2.15]>
   Sender: owner-cni-copyright_at_cni.org
   To: Multiple recipients of list <cni-copyright_at_cni.org>
   X-To: Multiple recipients of list <cni-copyright_at_cni.org>
   Reply-to: cni-copyright_at_cni.org
   Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9903021332580.7071-100000_at_shell1.ncal.verio.com>
   MIME-version: 1.0
   Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
   Precedence: bulk
   X-Listprocessor-version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
   
   
   On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Vance R. Koven <vrkoven_at_world.std.com> wrote:

>
> On 2/26/99, Terry Carroll <carroll_at_tjc.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've heard similar anecdotes regarding "Happy Birthday to You,"
> > whose melody (as distinguished from the lyrics or the combination of
> > melody+lyrics) I contend is in the public domain. The melody is the
> > same melody as the very clearly public domain "Good Morning to You."
>
> I guess Igor Stravinsky thought the same thing, but he still had to pay
> for the right to use the melody in one of his own pieces.
1. In what year? 2. Did the copyright owner prevail in court, or did the composer merely backdown to avoid litigation? -- Terry Carroll | "Report of the Committee On Governmental Affairs, Santa Clara, CA | United States Senate, To Accompany S. 1364, An Act To carroll_at_tjc.com | Eliminate Unnecessary and Wasteful Federal Reports." Modell delendus est | - Title of U.S. Senate Report 105-187, May 11, 1998 --Boundary_(ID_lzDPxfOxT6AjRp+u34z3GA)--
Received on Thu 04 Mar 1999 11:48:22 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT