Coming back in after a long weekend...
Well, I'm in favor of whatever will help us roll out a relatively stable version 2.x release which handles MIME.
I can live with #1 (although from the user/browser point of view is seems less efficient). I guess I was thinking along the lines of #2 when I sent the report last week. I have no objection to #3.
It seems like more work, but has the obvious advantage of being extensible. I wonder how many messages will actually be affected by this problem...
-- Craig A. Summerhill, Systems Coordinator and Program Officer Coalition for Networked Information 21 Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Internet: craig_at_cni.org AT&Tnet (202) 296-5098Received on Wed 17 Mar 1999 02:24:35 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT