Re: rewriting the getname() function again

From: Daniel Stenberg <dast_at_sth.frontec.se_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:10:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904181407340.13159-200000_at_metal.sth.frontec.se>

On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Paul Haldane wrote:

> I have a from line that I reckon the parser handles wrongly

Ah, you're right.

I've changed it now to only scan for ()-comments if there was no <>-address found in the line.

In a first glance, it seems to make your lines work better and I couldn't see any other examples fail because of it either.

As soon as we have something here that might work, I'll add it to the hypermail parser and release a new tar-ball. Many problems will be solved with this.

(Oh, right, the mime-decoding can be ignored by this parser since that'll be performed separatly before the function is called.)

Thanks for your feedback!

--
             Daniel Stenberg - http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol






TEXT/PLAIN attachment: fromparse.c

Received on Mon 19 Apr 1999 03:48:31 PM GMT