Re: rewriting the getname() function again

From: Daniel Stenberg <dast_at_sth.frontec.se_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 12:10:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9904201209210.14762-100000_at_metal.sth.frontec.se>

On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Craig A Summerhill wrote:

> One comment, I noticed in a mailbox of 2765 messages that the program
> OUTPUT 5535 entries. Given this, I hope that this code doesn't reflect
> the programs ability to parse messages in a mailbox. I suspect that it
> picked up a few extra entries along the lines where people had embedded
> within a message a forwarded header such as this:
>
> From: Craig A. Summerhill <craig_at_cni.org>
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:30:00 -0500
> Subject: something
>
> Just thought I would check about this though. Otherwise, there is
> a counter problem in the code...

What version does this concern? We had a counter problem in a previous version that I think is corrected nowadays, so it may be this problem you're experiencing if you're not using a recent version...

--
             Daniel Stenberg - http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol

Received on Tue 20 Apr 1999 02:45:41 PM GMT