> Yep, I'd say you found it. These later versions of hypermail are kinda
> picky about message ids: any messages with duplicate or missing ids are
> just simply dropped, with no warning.
Ouch ouch.
I checked my archive (1000-2000 messages, most created with HM 1.02) and
there are tons of messages with id="" :(
So...
I saw that this was already talked about quite a bit, but I'm not sure I saw
a definite conclusion about how HM will deal with it in the future. I know
having no Message-ID is wrong to begin with, so one way to look at it would
be to say 'hey, it's not HM's fault, fix your mail reader/sender app', but
that wouldn't help the maintainer of the archives much...
Also, I see that HM archive at landfield.com is using HM 2.0b4 - is that version better at handiling null message IDs?
What is the safest solution? Go back to HM 1.02?
Thanks,
Otis Received on Fri 04 Jun 1999 05:29:06 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT