On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Tom von Alten wrote:
> 8-bit characters encoded to 7-bits with MIME quoted-printable are
> getting decoded back to their 8-bit source, and pushed into the HTML
> view of the message in that form. I'm not sure of chapter and verse,
> but this isn't legal in HTML, is it?
If nothing else is stated, it is legal for HTML to assume the ISO8859-1 charset, yes.
> I thought 8-bit characters were supposed to be mapped into the &NNN; or
> &special-name; things for HTML.
They should, if we want to be nicer. Although that would give us a busload of troubles, especially when more exotic charsets are being used. I mean, just thinking about gathering the information about all 128 characters for all those weird charsets makes me scared...
> As it is, what I see is what was intended with Netscape v4.51 on either
> NT or hp-ux, but I imagine some (compliant) browsers aren't going to
> like the particular mapping...
I don't think this is any major problem as long as the charset of the mail is used. And I believe it is.
> Is this an issue that should be addressed for v2?
I vote no. Let's deal with that in 2.1...
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast/ You'll find my hypermail pages at http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast/hypermailReceived on Wed 06 Oct 1999 08:21:01 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT