# | I wanted to know what others still have outstanding that we need to
# | wait on before a release ? Does anyone know about the issues below
# | or other issues we should address before the release of 2.0 ???
#
# Ermmm ... don't want to spoil the party, but how about the src/mail.c
# code? As I wrote earlier, the code you suggested, Kent, failed at line
# 145 and attempts on my part to rectify things only resulted in more
# complaints further up.
#
# As to configure, it still can't figure out a couple of aspects on our
# SCO OS 5.0.x system. As I said, I'm willing to participate in any
# (small) way I can to help resolve this, if that's what you want; I've
# compiled a couple of other things with egcs since (i.a. ncurses 4.2 and
# the ncftp 3.0beta21 suite) - no change to configure, no warnings, just
# straight compiles.
When you don't have a clue about the OS because you don't have a copy, and it's been 5 years since you have, go to the source... ;)
I asked SCO for help and they responded quite quickly. The Open Source Program Architect for SCO is helping get configure corrected on UnixWare 7 and SCO OpenServer 5. Things are looking better as I type. :) I expect hypermail will be working on SCO out-of-the-box very shortly. ;)
-- Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502 Email: kent_at_landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/ Email: kent_at_nfr.net http://www.nfr.net/ Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/ Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/Received on Mon 25 Oct 1999 09:42:21 PM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT