# Well, the brilliant news is, that the CVS source with configure now
# compiles on SCO OS 5.0.5 without warnings, finds all the libraries,
# MAXPATHLEN etc - which it didn't before. What's more, the compiled
# hypermail works fine for me - but I haven't yet gone into the niceties.
Yep. Making progress. ;)
# Well, for me I get exactly the same as before. I answer a message using
# IE 5.0 on Win 95 (Norwegian versions of both, I must admit):
Ahhhhh!!! Bet there is no char type definition in the outbound HTML. That's why it probably works for me but not an alternate charset... I'll check into it.
# With Communicator 4.61/4.7 English on the same Norwegian Win 95, I get
# the same as before:
#
# "Invalid From: address". But both the local part and domain entered are
# both perfectly valid.
??? I've seen this when I entered a local address without a _at_domain section of the address. (I want to fix this but haven't.)
# | # Of course, if it were to quote original body as well in the reply,
# it'd
# | # be the bee's knees :-)
# | Such as putting it in <EM>original body</EM> ?
#
# Quoting as it's quoted above, so that if 'mail' is used as MUA, the
# person replying will be able to show something to reply to.
It's not meant as an MUA, just a simple submission form. Not sure how you would get a message into it.
# Warning! Don't try and test either Norwegian Win 95 or IE 5.0, unless
# you want to go prematurely grey. They're what I use to keep my Dutch
# colleags as far away from my PC as possible.
:)
-- Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502 Email: kent_at_landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/ Email: kent_at_nfr.net http://www.nfr.net/ Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/ Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/Received on Tue 26 Oct 1999 05:42:42 PM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT