Re: Problems with 2.0b25

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I agree. But if adding 100 things means 2 old functions accidentaly breaks,
> I'd still go for the 100 things and then spend time to fix the 2 added bugs.

Sure.

> Thanks for bringing the patch!

Thanks for maintaining and improving the source - all of you.

Regards,

        Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.