Re: Should we leave this automatic handling of signatures and HTML?

From: Eric Stewart <estewart_at_dudley.lib.usf.edu_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 10:59:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911051058030.9041-100000_at_dudley>

        Well, yours uses "-- \n". Mine (thanks to ye olde pine) users "--\n" (no space).

On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Martin Schulze wrote:

> jose.kahan_at_w3.org wrote:
> > In our previous episode, Peter C. McCluskey said:
> > >
> > > The autodetection of signatures works a lot of the time, and
> > > occasionally adding <PRE>'s where they don't belong does much
> > > less harm than avoiding them where they are needed, so I strongly
> > > object to removing this.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something. Is there any RFC defining this "--\n"
> > signature separation convention? I scanned some 20 recent messages in
> > my mailbox, all coming from different sources, and none of them uses
> > the "--\n" convention.
>
> What do they use instead?

-- 
Eric A. Stewart - Network Administrator - estewart_at_dudley.lib.usf.edu
University of South Florida, Tampa Campus Library - Systems
Work: http://www.lib.usf.edu/     | MS/MIS           | ICQ#
Play: http://cerebus.lib.usf.edu/ | Graduate Student | 31285736
SSI OW#100762 Last dive: 09/18 Gulf of Mex. 33 feet 33 min - Nurse Shark!
Received on Fri 05 Nov 1999 05:59:21 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT