# > However, I found another problem with
# > the Subject view. It seems that replies get their subject tags that some
# > lists include removed, and it starts as a new subject.
# >
# > Example:
# >
# > * [Danathara] Is everybody happy?
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:15:19 MDT)
# > * [Danathara] one more time...
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 18:45:20 MDT)
# > * [Danathara] This is fun :)
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:30:08 MDT)
# >
# > <big snip, and on with the replies>
# >
# > * Is everybody happy?
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:19:24 MDT)
# > * one more time...
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 18:48:40 MDT)
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 18:46:12 MDT)
# >
# > * This is fun :)
# > Sean Johnstone (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:44:57 MDT)
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:32:42 MDT)
# > Xual (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:30:30 MDT)
# >
# > etc..
#
# The same problem exists in 2b27, using input from both stdin (incremental)
# and an mbox. The problem does go away if I use the stripsubject directive,
# which for me is an acceptable workaround.
Could you send me a sample mailbox with just a couple messages that
show this ? Please send it to hypermail-data_at_landfield.com and I'll
see what I can do about fixing it.
--
Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502
Email: kent_at_landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/
Email: kent_at_nfr.net http://www.nfr.net/
Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/
Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
Received on Tue 23 Nov 1999 01:12:03 AM GMT