Re: strange problem (bug?) with set_inline_types

From: Kent Landfield <kent_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:09:54 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199911231809.MAA17523_at_landfield.com>


# In our previous episode, Kent Landfield said:
#
# Ah, I didn't know if it was a bug or a design choice :)

Oversight I guess. ;)

# Sounds OK to me. The change should go somewhere in ConfigAddItem.
# I wonder if you could use the cfg[i].changed flag to do what you're
# proposing?

Yeah I found that right after I posted the idea. I'll use that since it's already there for that purpose. :)

-- 
Kent Landfield                        Phone: 1-817-545-2502             
Email: kent_at_landfield.com             http://www.landfield.com/
Email: kent_at_nfr.net                   http://www.nfr.net/
Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/
Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
Received on Tue 23 Nov 1999 08:10:42 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT