Re: does uudecode actually work?

From: Peter C. McCluskey <pcm_at_rahul.net_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20000628212331.C76281DC0_at_foxtrot.rahul.net>

 tross_at_appworx.com (Tony Ross) writes:
>Greetings;
>
>We are receiving quite a number of emails with uuencoded files in the
>body, and hypermail 2b29 is not uudecode'ing these; it leaves the
>uuencoded file in the body of the html file.

 It looks from skimming the relevant parts of the source code like uudecode is only used for mime attachments that say they are uuencoded. I don't see any reason to decode other uuencoded text. The uuencoded file I recently sent (not as an attachment) wouldn't look very good if it were decoded into a gzip'd tar file.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter McCluskey          | The US Idea Futures Exchange: speculate on
http://www.rahul.net/pcm | political,financial issues at http://www.usifex.com
Received on Wed 28 Jun 2000 11:27:26 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:12 AM GMT GMT