Re: convtoshortdate

From: Daniel Stenberg <Daniel.Stenberg_at_sth.frontec.se_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 20:58:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980617205141.21172D-100000_at_metal>

On Wed, 17 Jun 1998 bush_at_sln.sln.org wrote:

> /> Reading new header...
> Process 22272 (hypermail) stopped on signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation violation
> (default) [convtoshortdate:1 +0x140,0x40bea0]
> Source (of date.c) not available for Process 22272
>
> Any guesses? I've only been on this list for a week or so -- I hope
> this is an appropriate forum.

Yes, this is the right forum.

It would be a whole lot easier if you could find exactly what mail that causes this and show that to us, or if the mail is sensitive, just paste us that particular date string (as it appears that is the one causing this).

--
             Daniel Stenberg - http://www.fts.frontec.se/~dast
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol

Received on Wed 17 Jun 1998 09:08:27 PM GMT