Re: Bug in 2.0b2

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 12:03:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <Pine.SO4.4.03.9809101156040.13881-100000_at_wcsw062>

On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Zvi Har'El wrote:

> I am sorry Daniel, but you failed to see the point: The null line is not
> necessary! The thing to check is as yoiu said, and not "\n\nFrom" !!!

There is no check for "\n\nFrom" today. The check is for "\nFrom ".

> I would express it sa a regexp check for "^From "

If that is what works, then of course we should do it that way. Hypermail 1.02 didn't do that check either.

> I switched to Majordomo last February, and all the UNIX mailboxes which
> where generated before the switch do not have this empty lines in many
> cases, so I am in troubles (ofcouse I can edit the mailboxes before
> invoking hypermail, but why don't do it correctly!)

You could also just send us the patch that corrects hypermail. Hypermail is an open source project you know.

   Daniel Stenberg     0708-317742
   ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
Received on Thu 10 Sep 1998 12:05:46 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:49 PM GMT GMT