In testing v2a23, we received a message from someone using Lotus Notes as a MTA and/or MUA. There was a JPEG file attached, and when I viewed it with my MUA (Outlook98), it was properly decoded, and I was able to launch my image viewer to see it.
However, in the archive, it was an "application/octet-stream attachment" and given a name ending in ".jpg_" My browser shows this as something less interesting than an image.
With the particular settings for this archive, it should have been brought in-line, actually.
Unfortunately, I don't have the original message to see exactly what it looked like - presumably the JPEG attachment *was* encoded as an octet stream. (Different than base64, I presume?)
My question is: should hypermail have been able to process this?
I will try to preserve another sample message before it's processed into the archive, but maybe someone can recognize the issue from these clues.
Thanks,
_____________ Hewlett-Packard Computer Peripherals Bristol
Tom von Alten mailto:Tom_vonAlten_at_boi.hp.com
This posting is for informational purposes only. It is not a statement of the Hewlett-Packard Co.Received on Wed 21 Jul 1999 12:59:25 AM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat 13 Mar 2010 03:46:11 AM GMT GMT