RE: octet-stream attachment

From: Tom von Alten <tom_vonalten_at_boi.hp.com_at_hypermail-project.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:00:16 -0600
Message-ID: <000601bedd10$e0a07560$c9d1020f_at_alien-nt.boi.hp.com>


Paul politely asked:
> Are you _sure_ you were running the patched version when you
> last saw the problem?

I thought I was, but when you underline it like that, no, I'm not sure.

So, I looked at the file dates of the new patched binary, and attachments matching the pattern att-*_

Sure enough, the binary was after noon on July 23rd, and the badly named attachments are no later than 8am on that day.

I guess I must've thought your fix was retroactive. :-*

We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.

_____________ Hewlett-Packard Computer Peripherals Bristol Tom von Alten mailto:Tom_vonAlten_at_boi.hp.com

          This posting is for informational purposes only.
          It is not a statement of the Hewlett-Packard Co.
Received on Mon 02 Aug 1999 07:59:59 PM GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT