Paul politely asked:
> Are you _sure_ you were running the patched version when you
> last saw the problem?
I thought I was, but when you underline it like that, no, I'm not sure.
So, I looked at the file dates of the new patched binary, and attachments matching the pattern att-*_
Sure enough, the binary was after noon on July 23rd, and the badly named attachments are no later than 8am on that day.
I guess I must've thought your fix was retroactive. :-*
We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.
_____________ Hewlett-Packard Computer Peripherals Bristol Tom von Alten mailto:Tom_vonAlten_at_boi.hp.com
This posting is for informational purposes only. It is not a statement of the Hewlett-Packard Co.Received on Mon 02 Aug 1999 07:59:59 PM GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu 22 Feb 2007 07:33:51 PM GMT GMT